ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-006517LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: exactRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Shell Alpert Salem Four-Light Photograph

July 16, 1952Salem, Massachusetts, United States

U.S. Coast Guard photographer Shell Alpert reported seeing and photographing four lights in formation through a laboratory window; Hall cites a Coast Guard letter saying the cause had never been determined.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Scientific & Observational Types(P-000101)→Official Investigations & Programs(P-000105)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Reported Encounter Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-693134reported
“U.S. Coast Guard photographer Shell Alpert reported seeing and photographing four lights in formation through a laboratory window; Hall cites a Coast Guard letter saying the cause had never been determined.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Photographs: Shell Alpert Salem Four-Light Photograph; uploaded PDF pp. 163-163
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Investigation Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-693135reported
“Officially associated photograph through Hall. Cause reportedly undetermined, but the image alone does not establish physical craft.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Photographs: evidential caveat for Shell Alpert Salem Four-Light Photograph; uploaded PDF pp. 163-163
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-694019disputed
“Hall reproduces two 1963 Air Force explanations for the Salem Coast Guard photograph: one calling it a double exposure and another calling the images light reflections on the window.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Salem photograph changing Air Force explanations; uploaded PDF pp. 206-207
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Photographic Evidence Dossier · Hall Phase 05 Special-Evidence Analysis

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-693009reported
“Hall’s photographic table contains 64 cases and uses explicit ratings: strongest (*), potentially strong ((*)), worth analysis/context (#), dubious/negative (X), and incomplete (Inc), alongside film-data/status codes.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Photographic catalogue and rating key; uploaded PDF pp. 157-160
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Air Force Statements / NICAP Rebuttals Dossier · Hall Section IX Air Force Investigation Claim

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-694016reported
“Hall groups recurrent Air Force explanation styles under the labels “counter-to-fact,” “shotgun,” and “zigzag,” with the latter describing explanations that change over time.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · NICAP taxonomy of counter-to-fact, shotgun and zigzag explanations; uploaded PDF pp. 201-201
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-694017disputed
“Hall contrasts Air Force statements that no UFO reports were withheld with AFR 200-2/JANAP release restrictions and with specific case correspondence cited in Section IX.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Nothing withheld statements and NICAP rebuttals; uploaded PDF pp. 201-204
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-694018disputed
“Hall contrasts Air Force correspondence minimizing or denying knowledge of the 1948 Estimate of the Situation with Ruppelt's description and Dewey Fournet's statement confirming that an early intelligence summary existed.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · 1948 document dispute and Fournet statement; uploaded PDF pp. 203-205
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-694041reported
“Hall reproduces Air Force news release 1108-57 of November 15, 1957, which selected five cases from the wave for conventional/hoax explanations: Levelland, James Stokes at White Sands/Orogrande, a Coast Guard cutter case, White Sands Army patrol sightings, and Reinhold Schmidt at Kearney.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · November 15, 1957 Air Force press release; uploaded PDF pp. 224-225
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.