ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-006346LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: exactRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Rutledge Texas Chase and Apparent Landing

January 10, 1961Wichita Falls-Benjamin corridor, Texas, United States

Pilot W. K. Rutledge and passenger George Thomas reported following a brilliant red object from Wichita Falls across north Texas until it slowed, descended, and appeared to land southwest of Benjamin. Law officers searched the area and Air Force personnel interviewed the witnesses the next day.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Scientific & Observational Types(P-000101)→Official Investigations & Programs(P-000105)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Reported Encounter Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-689116reported
“Rutledge and Thomas reported following a brilliant red object from Wichita Falls through several north-Texas towns until it slowed, descended in a glide, and appeared to land four to five miles southwest of Benjamin.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Rutledge chase and apparent landing; uploaded PDF pp. 67-67
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Investigation Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-689117reported
“Law officers searched for the apparent landing location, but communication problems prevented precise guidance and the next-day search did not establish a physical trace in Hall's account.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Search effort and absence of established physical trace; uploaded PDF pp. 67-68
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-689118reported
“Hall says Air Force Lt. McClure and a sergeant interviewed Rutledge and Thomas the next day and that Rutledge filled out what appeared to be a standard USAF Technical Information Sheet.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Air Force interview and Technical Information Sheet report; uploaded PDF pp. 67-68
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Pilots & Aviation Experts Dossier · Investigation Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-689087reported
“Hall argues that airline and military pilots are unusually experienced sky observers because their work requires repeated exposure to weather, aircraft, meteors, planets, and aviation hazards.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Section opening: pilot experience and evidentiary rationale; uploaded PDF pp. 52-53
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-689088reported
“Hall groups pilot reports into three broad patterns: geometrical objects, maneuvering or gyrating lights, and cigar-shaped or rocket-like objects.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · The Patterns: three pilot-report groupings; uploaded PDF pp. 53-53
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Pilots & Aviation Experts Dossier · Government Policy Decision

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-689089reported
“Hall notes that airline pilots were included in the CIRVIS vital-intelligence reporting system and cites 1954 meetings between airline representatives and MATS intelligence to speed reporting of unusual aerial objects.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · CIRVIS / MATS reporting-system discussion; uploaded PDF pp. 52-53
SUPPORTS