ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-006309LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: exactRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Nash-Fortenberry Disc Formation Near Newport News

July 14, 1952Newport News / Norfolk area, Virginia, United States

Pan American pilots William B. Nash and William Fortenberry reported six bright red-orange circular objects approaching below their DC-4 in echelon formation, flipping edge-on and reversing direction in a coordinated maneuver; two additional objects then reportedly joined the formation.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Disc / Saucer(C-000253)→Scientific & Observational Types(P-000101)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Reported Encounter Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-689025reported
“Hall describes six red-orange circular objects approaching in a stepped echelon, flipping edge-on together and reversing direction without an observed turn arc; two more objects then emerged and joined the formation.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Nash-Fortenberry formation maneuver; uploaded PDF pp. 29-29
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-689099reported
“Section V gives the fuller Nash-Fortenberry sequence: six fiery red circular objects in narrow echelon formation flipped edge-on in unison, reversed direction without an arc, and were joined by two similar objects before all eight climbed away.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Expanded Nash-Fortenberry formation narrative; uploaded PDF pp. 54-56
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Investigation Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-689100reported
“Nash describes repeated post-event timing reconstructions that yielded about twelve seconds; the pilots conservatively used fifteen seconds for at least fifty miles of travel and calculated 12,000 mph.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Nash-Fortenberry reconstructed timing and speed computation; uploaded PDF pp. 56-56
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-689101reported
“Nash said Air Force investigators interviewed the pilots separately, compared sketches and tracks, and told them that seven other reports had already been received.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Nash account of Air Force investigation; uploaded PDF pp. 55-56
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Nash-Fortenberry Disc Formation (1952) · Reported Craft Appearance

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-689026reported
“Nash described the objects as circular with sharply defined edges; during the edge-on phase they appeared roughly coin-like with an estimated thickness of about 15 feet.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Nash-Fortenberry morphology; uploaded PDF pp. 29-29
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

The UFO Evidence (1964) Selected Case Corpus · Hall / NICAP Corpus Method

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-689001reported
“The Abstract says NICAP selected 740 reports after considering more than 5,000 signed reports and many hundreds of reports from newspapers and other publications, emphasizing observer qualifications and multiple-observer cases.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Selection method and 740-report figure; uploaded PDF pp. 3-3 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-689002reported
“Later in the Introduction Hall says the report contains 746 sightings: 575 in the main chronology and 171 in separate concentration chronologies.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · 746-sighting total and chronology breakdown; uploaded PDF pp. 8-8 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-689003reported
“Hall states that 50% of the 575 main-chronology cases involved trained or experienced observers.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Trained/experienced observer statistic; uploaded PDF pp. 8-8 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

The UFO Evidence (1964) Selected Case Corpus · Investigation Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-689004reported
“NICAP explicitly distinguishes its physical-UFO investigation from contactee, religious, philosophical, and spiritual claims and says its investigations found no evidence supporting claimed rides in flying saucers, while alleging considerable fraud in that area.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · NICAP scope and contactee/fraud disclaimer; uploaded PDF pp. 4-5 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS