ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-002214LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: exactRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Minot Radar-Visual Missile-Field UFO Case

October 24, 1968Minot AFB missile field, North Dakota, United States

The source summarizes missile-security and maintenance observations, base weather-radar tracking, B-52 airborne radar and visual reports, and a large Project Blue Book case file.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Nuclear & Defense Incursions(P-000102)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Reported Radar Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-200035reported
“The book summarizes the October 24, 1968 Minot case as involving overlapping reports from missile security/maintenance teams, base weather radar, and a B-52’s airborne radar and crew, and notes that the Project Blue Book file contains more than 130 pages.”
UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
SRC-002102 · October 24, 1968 Minot case overview and radar/visual evidence; uploaded PDF pages 332-336
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-520025reported
“For October 24, 1968, Hastings summarizes missile-field visuals, Minot weather-radar tracking, and B-52 airborne radar tracking. McCaslin recalled a return as large as or larger than a KC-135, while Ritchey activated the radarscope camera.”
UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
SRC-002102 · Minot visuals, weather radar, B-52 radar and radarscope camera; uploaded PDF pages 332-335
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-520026reported
“Former intelligence officer Richard Clark told investigators that he calculated a mean speed of about 3,900 mph from an apparent two-mile displacement during a three-second B-52 radar sweep.”
UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
SRC-002102 · Clark 3,900-mph radar-image calculation; uploaded PDF pages 334-335
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Government / Documentary Record

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-200036reported
“Hastings quotes Project Blue Book’s November 13, 1968 conclusion that ground observations could be Sirius/B-52, the B-52 radar contact and UHF loss could be plasma or ball lightning, and the airborne visual could be Vega, a ground light, or plasma.”
UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
SRC-002102 · Project Blue Book explanation; uploaded PDF pages 336-338
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-520029reported
“Hastings reproduces Quintanilla’s November 13, 1968 conclusion that ground visuals could be Sirius and the B-52, radar/UHF effects could be plasma or ball lightning, and the airborne visual could be Vega, a ground light, or plasma.”
UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
SRC-002102 · Project Blue Book November 13, 1968 explanation; uploaded PDF pages 336-337
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Reported Encounter Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-520027reported
“Hastings reports that while the object paced the B-52, outgoing UHF transmissions temporarily failed while reception continued; transmission resumed when the object moved away and interference reportedly recurred during a later close overflight.”
UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
SRC-002102 · B-52 UHF transmit interruption/recovery; uploaded PDF pages 334-336
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-520028reported
“Partin later described an orange oblong object with illuminated window-like features; Runyon recalled a large orange oval/tubular form with a crescent-like illuminated portion and explicitly cautioned that his dimensions were estimated roughly 32 years later.”
UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
SRC-002102 · Partin/Runyon visual descriptions and dimensional caveat; uploaded PDF pages 335-336
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.