Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
CLAIM-216200reported
“The original Louisville airport witness reported a slowly moving object over the runway that rotated roughly four times per minute, alternately presenting a reflective cylindrical aspect and a dark diamond-like aspect before pausing for 30-45 seconds and ascending above the clouds.”
CLAIM-216202reported
“A MUFON contact at the airport initially said multiple Public Safety Officers had seen the object and had it on film; later follow-up said approximately 10-15 people saw something, while about 8-9 reportedly described a triangle.”
CLAIM-216205reported
“The original witness noted that nearby workers could not see the same object when he called their attention to it and suggested his polarized sunglasses might have affected visibility.”
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
CLAIM-216204reported
“The investigation filed an FAA FOIA request for radar and voice recordings. The source excerpt says the request was still pending as of August 1, 2009; it also reports that an initially claimed film later was said not to exist or never to have been made.”
SOURCE COMPARISON
Louisville Rotating Cylinder/Diamond Object (2009) · New Insights reported subject characteristics
HOW TO READ THIS →CLAIM-216201reported
“The witness compared the object to a Coors beer can standing on end; one side appeared silver/mirrored and the other black. He estimated roughly 1,500 feet ASL and crew-van apparent size, while acknowledging the estimates were visual.”
SOURCE COMPARISON
Louisville Reported Triangle Object (2009) · New Insights reported subject characteristics
HOW TO READ THIS →CLAIM-216203reported
“Other airport workers reportedly described a triangular object, and one claimed cellphone photograph showed a triangle. The original reporting witness was adamant that the object in that photo was not what he had seen.”