ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-006603LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: exactRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Kinross F-89 Radar Intercept and Disappearance

Night of November 23, 1953Lake Superior intercept area, Lake Superior, United States / Canada

Air Defense Command radar reportedly tracked an unidentified target over Lake Superior and guided an F-89C interceptor toward it. Hall says the two radar blips appeared to merge before radar contact with the F-89 was lost; the aircraft and crew were never recovered. USAF later identified the target as an RCAF C-47, while Hall reproduces RCAF correspondence denying a matching incident.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Scientific & Observational Types(P-000101)→Official Investigations & Programs(P-000105)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Reported Encounter Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-694033reported
“Hall reports that Air Defense radar detected an unidentified target over Lake Superior and guided an F-89C toward it; ground controllers then saw the interceptor blip close on the target, merge with it and disappear from the scope.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Kinross radar intercept and loss sequence; uploaded PDF pp. 217-220
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Investigation Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-694034disputed
“Hall reproduces the Air Force position that the target was an RCAF C-47 and that the F-89 then crashed for unknown reasons, while also reproducing RCAF correspondence stating that its records showed no report of such an incident in the Lake Superior area.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Kinross USAF C-47 identification versus RCAF correspondence; uploaded PDF pp. 218-220
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-694035disputed
“Hall also quotes an Air Force information sheet saying Flying Safety officials presumed the pilot suffered vertigo and crashed into the lake, and argues this does not explain the reported radar-merger sequence.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Kinross vertigo/crash hypothesis; uploaded PDF pp. 220-220
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.