ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-009565LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: exactRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Haderslev Police Car E-M / Retracting Light-Beam Encounter

August 13, 1970Haderslev roadway, Southern Denmark, Denmark

Officer E. H. Maarup reported simultaneous patrol-car engine, lights, dashboard and radio failure while a brilliant cone of light surrounded the vehicle, then an egg-like craft apparently retracting that light before departure.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Cone / Bell / Hat(C-000259)→Scientific & Observational Types(P-000101)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Hall Volume II Encounter Claim

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-952119reported
“Maarup reported patrol-car engine/electrical/radio failure while a light cone surrounded the car, followed by an egg-like object apparently retracting the cone and departing.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · August 13, 1970 Haderslev; uploaded PDF pp. 204-205
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Hall Volume II Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-952126unverified
“Hall says photographs were taken and film turned over to defense authorities, but the original film and analysis are not available in this ingestion.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Haderslev photo claim caveat; uploaded PDF pp. 204-205
CONTEXTUALIZES
CLAIM-953215reported
“Hall considered Haderslev very promising and cited Danish Defence Command investigation, but noted that image analysis remained incomplete.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Haderslev analysis limitations; uploaded PDF pp. 305-306
CONTEXTUALIZES
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Hall Volume II Evidence Claim

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-953214reported
“The automatic camera in Officer Maarup’s patrol car produced three exposures containing a spot of light during the existing Haderslev E-M encounter.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Haderslev patrol-camera photographs; uploaded PDF pp. 305-306
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Hall Volume II Recurring Feature

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-954190reported
“Section IX uses Haderslev as an example of an egg/oval craft apparently retracting an intense cone of light into its underside during a patrol-car E-M encounter.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Haderslev beam example; uploaded PDF pp. 396-396
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Police-Witness Evidence Framework · Hall Volume II Source Framework

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-952101reported
“Hall argues police reports are valuable because officers routinely observe roads, communities and unusual incidents and often leave contemporaneous logs or radio records.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Police witness framing; uploaded PDF pp. 184-211 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Police-Witness Evidence Framework · Hall Volume II Recurring Feature

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-952102reported
“Section V contains repeated low structured objects, pursuit behavior, light beams, vehicle effects, multi-jurisdiction observations and occasional traces or photographs.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Recurring Section V patterns; uploaded PDF pp. 184-211 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Photographic-Evidence Framework · Hall Volume II Source Framework

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-953200reported
“Hall retains the 1964 principle that a still photograph is only approximately as reliable as the person who took it and the documented circumstances surrounding it.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Photographic evidence witness-reliability principle; uploaded PDF pp. 297-299 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Photographic-Evidence Framework · Hall Volume II Evidence Claim

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-953201reported
“Hall evaluates six factors: witness character, strangeness, camera technical data, direct testimony/circumstances, completeness of analysis and peer review.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Hall six-factor photographic rating methodology; uploaded PDF pp. 297-299 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-953230disputed
“Hall discusses an anomalous October 1978 DMSP weather-satellite image obtained through an Elmendorf AFB weather center. Bruce Maccabee reportedly ruled out several image artifacts but could not fully exclude a satellite or space-debris object.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · October 1978 DMSP weather-satellite anomalous image; uploaded PDF pp. 312-313
CONTEXTUALIZES
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Photographic-Evidence Framework · Hall Volume II Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-953202reported
“Hall stresses that a technically authentic image does not by itself establish the identity or extraordinary origin of the photographed object.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Image authenticity versus object identity caveat; uploaded PDF pp. 297-299 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Model-UFO / Typical-Features Framework · Hall Volume II Source Framework

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-955250reported
“Hall’s model-UFO table uses ten recurring features: multiple witnesses, disc/ellipse shape, E-M effects, body lights, bright illumination, light beams, hover-acceleration, sharp maneuvers, physiological effects and physical effects.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · The Model UFO/Table 2 typical features; uploaded PDF pp. 463-465
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Model-UFO / Typical-Features Framework · Hall Volume II Recurring Feature

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-955251reported
“Hall selects ten cases to illustrate combinations of the model features and describes Socorro as prototypical in other respects because of witness quality, traces, prompt investigation and an unresolved official outcome.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Model-case discussion; uploaded PDF pp. 463-465
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Model-UFO / Typical-Features Framework · Hall Volume II Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-955253unverified
“The typical-feature table intentionally favors detailed multi-channel cases and therefore should not be interpreted as the necessary definition of every UFO report.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Model-feature caveat; uploaded PDF pp. 463-465
CONTEXTUALIZES