ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-006502LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: seasonRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Goose Bay Dual-GCA Radar Target Reports

Summer 1948Goose Bay Air Base, Labrador, Canada

Retired Major Edwin A. Jerome told NICAP that American and Canadian GCA radars independently displayed a target computed near 9,000 mph and that both radars next day showed an object apparently hovering around 45,000 feet.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Scientific & Observational Types(P-000101)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Reported Encounter Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-693104reported
“Retired Major Edwin A. Jerome told NICAP that American and Canadian GCA radars independently displayed a target computed near 9,000 mph and that both radars next day showed an object apparently hovering around 45,000 feet.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Radar UFO Sightings: Goose Bay Dual-GCA Radar Target Reports; uploaded PDF pp. 148-149
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Investigation Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-693105reported
“Retrospective account rather than directly ingested radar logs. Jerome records meteor and high-flying-seagull explanations as official stories and rejects them; those explanations and his rejection remain source-level.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Radar UFO Sightings: evidential caveat for Goose Bay Dual-GCA Radar Target Reports; uploaded PDF pp. 148-149
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Radar Evidence Dossier · Hall Phase 05 Special-Evidence Analysis

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-693007reported
“Hall distinguishes diffuse/intermittent meteorological radar returns, sharp persistent targets resembling solid objects, and slow-moving radar “angels,” and argues that specialized radar patterns require case-specific analysis.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Radar theory and target-type discussion; uploaded PDF pp. 142-148
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-693008reported
“Hall considers simultaneous radar-visual cases stronger than radar-only cases because two modes of observation can constrain explanations.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Radar-visual evidential framework; uploaded PDF pp. 142-148
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.