ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-006508LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: exactRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Fort Monmouth Two-Object Radar Tracking

July 1, 1952Fort Monmouth area, New Jersey, United States

Hall reports two unidentified targets tracked by radar at Fort Monmouth in a sequence that included visual sightings of shiny objects and a period of apparent hovering at high altitude before rapid departure.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Scientific & Observational Types(P-000101)→Official Investigations & Programs(P-000105)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Reported Encounter Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-693116reported
“Hall reports two unidentified targets tracked by radar at Fort Monmouth in a sequence that included visual sightings of shiny objects and a period of apparent hovering at high altitude before rapid departure.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Radar UFO Sightings: Fort Monmouth Two-Object Radar Tracking; uploaded PDF pp. 151-151
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Investigation Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-693117reported
“Air Force-associated radar case through a secondary compilation. Direct radar logs and case records are required for stronger grading.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Radar UFO Sightings: evidential caveat for Fort Monmouth Two-Object Radar Tracking; uploaded PDF pp. 151-151
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Radar Evidence Dossier · Hall Phase 05 Special-Evidence Analysis

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-693007reported
“Hall distinguishes diffuse/intermittent meteorological radar returns, sharp persistent targets resembling solid objects, and slow-moving radar “angels,” and argues that specialized radar patterns require case-specific analysis.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Radar theory and target-type discussion; uploaded PDF pp. 142-148
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-693008reported
“Hall considers simultaneous radar-visual cases stronger than radar-only cases because two modes of observation can constrain explanations.”
The UFO Evidence
SRC-002107 · Radar-visual evidential framework; uploaded PDF pp. 142-148
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
Fort Monmouth Two-Object Radar Tracking (July 1, 1952): Evidence Dossier & Witness Reports | ANOMALY | ANOMALY UAP Archive & Controlled Vocabulary