ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-009620LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: exactRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Chatsworth Multi-Witness Photographic / Film Sighting

1981-01-25Chatsworth, California, United States

Roughly twenty to thirty witnesses reported a white elongated object over Chatsworth for an extended afternoon interval; multiple photographs, slides and 8mm film were obtained, while some aided-eye observers described a domed disc.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Disc / Saucer(C-000253)→Scientific & Observational Types(P-000101)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Hall Volume II Encounter Claim

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-953231reported
“Twenty to thirty independent witnesses reportedly observed a white elongated object for roughly forty-five minutes; multiple still photographs, slides and 8mm film were obtained, while some aided-eye witnesses described a domed disc with red edge lights.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Chatsworth multi-witness photographic/film event; uploaded PDF pp. 313-315
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Hall Volume II Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-953232reported
“Image-only analysis could not exclude a high-flying aircraft if witness motion descriptions were ignored.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Chatsworth aircraft/image-analysis caveat; uploaded PDF pp. 313-315
CONTEXTUALIZES
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Photographic-Evidence Framework · Hall Volume II Source Framework

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-953200reported
“Hall retains the 1964 principle that a still photograph is only approximately as reliable as the person who took it and the documented circumstances surrounding it.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Photographic evidence witness-reliability principle; uploaded PDF pp. 297-299 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Photographic-Evidence Framework · Hall Volume II Evidence Claim

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-953201reported
“Hall evaluates six factors: witness character, strangeness, camera technical data, direct testimony/circumstances, completeness of analysis and peer review.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Hall six-factor photographic rating methodology; uploaded PDF pp. 297-299 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-953230disputed
“Hall discusses an anomalous October 1978 DMSP weather-satellite image obtained through an Elmendorf AFB weather center. Bruce Maccabee reportedly ruled out several image artifacts but could not fully exclude a satellite or space-debris object.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · October 1978 DMSP weather-satellite anomalous image; uploaded PDF pp. 312-313
CONTEXTUALIZES
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hall Volume II Photographic-Evidence Framework · Hall Volume II Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-953202reported
“Hall stresses that a technically authentic image does not by itself establish the identity or extraordinary origin of the photographed object.”
The UFO Evidence, Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report
SRC-009500 · Image authenticity versus object identity caveat; uploaded PDF pp. 297-299 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS