ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY
E-006201LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: yearRECORD COMPLETENESS: 100%

Blytheville AFB Oblong-Object Report (1967)

1967; exact date not established in the Phase-2 source passageBlytheville Air Force Base area, Arkansas, United States

Three Blytheville AFB witnesses reported two dark oblong objects crossing the area in a straight east-to-west path before turning southwest. Hynek notes a reported RAPCON confirmation but explicitly declines to classify the case Radar-Visual because the specific radar data were not available.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Elongated / Cigar / Cylinder(C-000255)→Scientific & Observational Types(P-000101)→
Claims are displayed with the source wording, locator, relationship and verification state. Competing claims remain separate rather than being averaged into a single answer.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Reported Encounter Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-671020reported
“The Blytheville witnesses estimated the objects at roughly 1,200 to 1,500 feet altitude, moving in a straight east-to-west line before turning southwest and disappearing after approximately 15 to 30 seconds.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Blytheville trajectory and altitude; uploaded PDF pp. 87-89
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Encounter · Hynek Evidence / Interpretation Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-671021reported
“Hynek notes that visual spotting was reported as confirmed by Blytheville AFB RAPCON at about two nautical miles, but he explicitly does not classify the case Radar-Visual because the specific radar data were not available.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Blytheville RAPCON mention and Radar-Visual exclusion; uploaded PDF pp. 87-89
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-671022reported
“Hynek reports that the Air Force material treated the witnesses as reliable and concluded that a genuine sighting or phenomenon had occurred while finding insufficient information to determine its cause; Hynek criticizes the lack of meaningful follow-up.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Air Force assessment and Hynek follow-up criticism; uploaded PDF pp. 87-90
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Blytheville Oblong / Table-Platter Objects (1967 Report) · Reported Craft Appearance

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-671019reported
“Hynek's Blytheville example describes two dark oblong-shaped devices whose appearance was compared to a table platter, with an apparent short exhaust-like feature.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Blytheville morphology; uploaded PDF pp. 87-89
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hynek Daylight Discs · Hynek Observational Classification

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-670011reported
“Hynek calls distant daytime reports Daylight Discs because oval or disc-like shapes predominate, while cautioning that the term is applied loosely.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Daylight Discs definition and loose use of disc terminology; uploaded PDF pp. 41-41 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-671008reported
“Hynek explains that the Daylight Disc label is applied rather loosely: oval or disc-like shapes predominate, but the observational category is not limited to one exact hull form.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Daylight Disc category scope; uploaded PDF pp. 71-72
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-676006reported
“Appendix 1 preserves Daylight Disc cases as selected daytime reports, including reports whose apparent shapes vary and do not always establish a literal disc hull.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Daylight Disc appendix entries; book pp. 289-294 in the 1974 Corgi edition · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hynek Daylight Discs · Hynek Strangeness / Probability Framework

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-671009reported
“Hynek's selected Daylight Disc examples involve 60 reporters, averaging about 4.8 observers per case with a median of four; he deliberately excludes single-observer reports from the selected prototype set.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Selected Daylight Disc witness statistics; uploaded PDF pp. 72-73
SUPPORTS
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hynek Daylight Discs · Reported Encounter Observation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-671010reported
“Hynek notes that the selected Daylight Disc reports are almost uniformly noiseless despite descriptions of apparently structured objects in motion.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Reported silence pattern; uploaded PDF pp. 74-76
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-671011reported
“Hynek describes recurrent reports of wobbling, tumbling or falling-leaf-like motion among daylight objects.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Wobble/tumble/falling-leaf motion; uploaded PDF pp. 75-77
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-671013reported
“In a Three Hills, Alberta example, Hynek reports that two farmers described an object like a snubbed dill pickle with a greenish-blue glow; truck drivers were also reported to have seen it, and the object was described as silent while a more distant airplane remained audible.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Three Hills, Alberta example; uploaded PDF pp. 73-75
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-671017reported
“Hynek describes a General Mills Aeronautical Research Laboratory report in which three research engineers tracking a 79-foot balloon near 73,000 feet with a theodolite noticed a white smoke or vapor trail lower in the sky, followed an object traveling horizontally for roughly thirty seconds, then saw it dive nearly vertically while glowing intermittently.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · General Mills Aeronautical Research Laboratory example; uploaded PDF pp. 82-84
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hynek Daylight Discs · Hynek Evidence / Interpretation Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-671012reported
“Hynek discusses reports of smooth departures and very rapid acceleration, sometimes without a reported sonic boom, but says the available data are insufficient for a definitive physical judgment.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Acceleration, sonic-boom and physical-interpretation caveat; uploaded PDF pp. 75-77
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-671014reported
“Hynek says a purported Daylight Disc photograph should not be taken seriously unless a reputable photographer also visually saw the object, the original negatives and camera are available, and the owner is willing to testify under oath; he allows that multiple independent photographs could relax the final criterion.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · Photographic evidence criteria; uploaded PDF pp. 77-79
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-671018reported
“Hynek notes that nearby radar was inoperative and two F-86 aircraft did not obtain a useful correlation; Blue Book nevertheless retained the report as unidentified.”
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
SRC-002104 · General Mills negative radar/fighter evidence and Blue Book disposition; uploaded PDF pp. 82-84
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hynek Daylight Discs · Investigation Sample Statistic

HOW TO READ THIS →
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hynek Daylight Discs · Proposed Explanation

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-681021reported
“The remaining Daylight Disc IFOs comprised five meteors, two observations of Venus, and one each involving lenticular clouds, ordinary cloud, birds, a sunrise effect, power-line fixtures, a physiological visual disorder, and kite wire.”
The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating and Reporting UFO Sightings
SRC-002105 · Complete DD IFO explanation distribution; book pp. 57-69 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hynek Daylight Discs · Explanation Basis

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-681018reported
“Hendry reports that balloons were usually described as round, oval, or teardrop-shaped, white or silver, slow-moving or hovering, and visible for fifteen minutes to an hour or longer, with changing high-altitude winds and illumination producing apparent climbs, descents, and color changes.”
The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating and Reporting UFO Sightings
SRC-002105 · Balloon appearance, motion, duration and confirmation; book pp. 57-61 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-681020reported
“Aircraft viewed edge-on or in glare were reported as domed discs, oblongs, globes, triangles, eggs, or other apparently wingless shapes; ordinary turns and climbs could appear abrupt along the witness line of sight.”
The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating and Reporting UFO Sightings
SRC-002105 · Edge-on aircraft shapes and apparent maneuvers; book pp. 61-64 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-681022reported
“A family driving past Camp Pendleton interpreted power-line marker spheres as ten to fifteen round objects in formation because the wires were invisible against distant hills and the car's motion supplied apparent horizontal flight.”
The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating and Reporting UFO Sightings
SRC-002105 · Camp Pendleton power-line marker case; book pp. 66-66 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
CLAIM-681023reported
“On September 13, 1976, thirteen adults including a police officer in Bloomington, Indiana, reported an elongated aluminum object glowing centrally with edge lights; follow-up identified sunlight reflecting from kite wire between trees.”
The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating and Reporting UFO Sightings
SRC-002105 · Bloomington kite-wire multiwitness case; book pp. 67-67 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
SOURCE COMPARISON

Hynek Daylight Discs · Investigation Source Caveat

HOW TO READ THIS →
CLAIM-683020reported
“Hendry regards Daylight Disc reports as a comparatively conservative and potentially more physical foundation because daylight can provide better shape and motion information, while still emphasizing aircraft, balloon, distance, and single-witness alternatives.”
The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating and Reporting UFO Sightings
SRC-002105 · Daylight Disc interpretation; book pp. 120-128 · PRIMARY SOURCE
SUPPORTS
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.
Blytheville AFB Oblong-Object Report (1967) (1967; exact date not established in the Phase-2 source passage): Evidence Dossier & Witness Reports | ANOMALY | ANOMALY UAP Archive & Controlled Vocabulary